Re: EmacsW32 invocation options

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Brian Elmegaard <brian@rkspeed-rugby.dk>
> Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 07:24:02 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > It makes it harder because they use Emacs that behaves not as
> > documented in subtle ways.
> 
> >From a short google on groups it seems that the emacs developers find
> emacsW32 ("EmacsW32 is not Emacs for MS Windows. Instead it is an
> add-on to Emacs for MS Windows.") worse than aquamacs ("Aquamacs
> features extensive customization: it will feel and behave mostly like
> an Aqua program"). 
> 
> Why is that?

Maybe because most Emacs developers don't know anything about
Aquamacs.  That includes myself.