[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: planner or org or ...

From: Tim X
Subject: Re: planner or org or ...
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 18:40:45 +1000
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Xavier Maillard <address@hidden> writes:

>    ----- Tim X (2007-05-27) wrote:-----
>    > So, I think that while the functionality is similar, the underlying
>    > philosophy is a bit different and they approach things from a
>    > different perspective re: planning and organising your work. On some
>    > levels, it is a bit like a comparison of vi and emacs - both can
>    > achieve the same outcomes, but do it differently and one way suits
>    > some people while another way suits others. My main bias towards
>    > planner mode is probably a simple as it being the first mode of this
>    > type I used under emacs and it has set my expectations.
>    The difference is: org is the Emacs of organizers. Planner is an
>    organizer.
>    org let you create your own way of GTD. Planner creates a way of GTD for
>    you.
> I don't get it. In what org is more complicated than planner. I
> feel the contrary. Planner lets you create your *own* GTD too.
I think you don't get it because you feel there is a right and a wrong answer.
Its about personal taste and preferences. There is nothing 'to get' - some
people like red wine, some like white, some like both and some like neither. It
doesn't mean red is better than white or white is better than red. 

tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]