Re: Nested Lambda function gives error in common lisp, guile, emacs lisp but works in scheme. Why?

[Pascal Costanza]

namekuseijin wrote:
> On 8 out, 03:42, Pascal Costanza <p...@p-cos.net> wrote:
> > Whatever. Lisp-1 just sucks. ;-)
>
> Lisp2 is insane and verbose.  There's nothing more natural than having
> functions as first-class values and as simple a rule as saying "car of
> an evaluated list is a function".  No obfuscation nor confusion
> whatsoever.

I see. :)


Pascal

--
My website: http://p-cos.net
Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org
Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/