[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Nice fonts for emacs 22 GTK on Linux ?

From: Tim X
Subject: Re: Nice fonts for emacs 22 GTK on Linux ?
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:51:57 +1100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Brian Adkins <address@hidden> writes:

> On Feb 6, 6:38 pm, Nick Roberts <address@hidden> wrote:
>>  > I used this branch:
>>  >
>>  > cvs -z3 -d:pserver:address@hidden:/sources/emacs co -r emacs-unicode-2 
>> emacs
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Details here:
>>  >
>>  >
>> If you check that link it points out that emacs-unicode-2 has recently been
>> merged to the trunk and that
>> cvs -z3 -d:pserver:address@hidden:/sources/emacs co emacs
>> should be enough now.
>> To update from the trunk, instead ofemacs-unicode-2, just do
>> cvs update -A
>> as further Unicode development will happen there.
>> --
>> Nick                                
> Thanks guys! I don't know how I got the impression that the emacss22
> package was all I needed - what a frustrating experience. By the way,
> if someone could edit that wiki page to make it more clear, it might
> be helpful. As I explained in my blog post:

Hi Brian. You write a nice blog and obviously have good communication
skills. Given that emacswiki is a eh wiki and given you know where it
could be improved, why not just jump in an do it?

> After hours of Googling, I became too hasty, and when I read the
> statement:
> "Note: Since the emacs-unicode-2 branch which had the xft support is
> merged into trunk, the current page is obsolete."
> I thought it applied to the entire wiki page even though the correct
> solution immediately follows that statement. It was my mistake, but it
> may happen to others also. How about simply removing the obsolete
> information, or moving it to an archived page?
> Also, can this information be put on the main emacs page?:
> I'm not sure making people work so hard to get nice fonts on emacs is
> such a good idea :(
> One last question. How bleeding edge is ? For my current
> research purposes, it's not a problem, but if I do end up switching
> and relying on emacs for my day-to-day editing needs, is it fairly
> stable?
> Thanks,
> Brian Adkins

I've been running CVS emacs for quite some time and update usually every
week or so. Generally, I've found no problems and its very stable - you
may get minor niggles from time to time. 

What I tend  to do is run two cvs working areas and alternate between
them. If the latest version is less stable than the version I already
had, I can switch back to it. 


tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]