help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Octave Help Mode?


From: Christian Herenz
Subject: Re: Octave Help Mode?
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:32:43 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 SUSE/1.1.7-3.4 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

David Hansen schrieb:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:42:41 +0200 Christian Herenz wrote:
It's working here but I use a developer version of emacs.  Is C-h S
working?
I am not at my computer at the moment, so I cannot test this. However,
I noted yesterday, when browsing the GNU Octave Info File lots of
Nodes which are shown in the index are actually not present. Is this
right, or does openSUSE ship a wrong info file. Sorry, this tends to
be more an octave question, but since I am using it inside Emacs, I
ask here.

This seems to be suses fault.  With Debians GNU Octave, version 3.0.0
the manual looks pretty complete here.

I installed now from SUSEs Science Repo Octave 3.0.0, and now everything works as expected. Seems to be a bug in the default octave package which is shipped with 10.2.

Maybe adjust INFO_PATH but that sounds like a Debilian bug.

Do you mean the shell-variable INFO_PATH, which I would export in my
.profile (or simialar), or do you mean something emacs-specific?

The shell variable

As stated above, just entering "info octave" in a normal terminal
works fine.

Hmm, you can try to set `Info-additional-directory-list' then, but this
actually looks more like an Emacs bug to me.

This is acutally what happens on the debian-machine I occasionally have to work on. But it seems, that sarge ships a rather old version of octave: GNU Octave, version 2.1.73. So would be nice, if a sarge user could report on this issue?

I would contact the sysadmin at our university, but it seems that they are playing a little bit the devils-advocate by promoting heavily Matlab (they won't give me full points, cause I solve my exercises in octave-code rather than with matlab (even pointing out the differences)... really pi**** about this atm, but this NEEDS to be discussed somewhere else (hints?))



The thing is, I really want to work with octave, and I just think it
is good to look something up directly inside the environment I am
doing my octave stuff (i.e. emacs), however since I am fan of printed
works I ordered via my libary today the "GNU Octave Manual" by
J.W. Eaton (Network Theory Ltd.). Since it is not present in my
home-libary I have to wait a little bit (cause its inter-libary loan),
but I will fill out some forms today, that more "official" printed GNU
Documentation will be available in our libary soon. At present, there
is actually none :(

You can also produce pdf or ps from the texinfo sources if that is good
enough for you.

Yeah, and I could print that out. But I really like to have a book. Maybe I am a bit old-fashioned in that way, but actually a browsing the information in a book than in a pile of printed paper (or even worse, a pdf on the screen) seems to be more natural to me. But just for looking up things quickly, the octave-help is best.

Greets,
Christian


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]