|
From: | Lennart Borgman (gmail) |
Subject: | Re: LISP routines for commenting |
Date: | Sat, 09 Aug 2008 19:11:26 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Thierry Volpiatto wrote:
"Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> writes:Thierry Volpiatto wrote:Python-mode provide a command for indenting that is bind to: C-c # ==> comment C-u C-c # ==> uncomment The command is: `py-comment-region' It is better to comment with that instead of the usual M-; because it don't affect indentation after a block of commented code.Do you mean that this is a bug in the support for M-; in phyton-mode? Or is it a bug in M-;I don't think it's a bug, it's just better to comment with the proper function in python, especially if there is complex level of indentation (loop followed with other loop and if if if...etc).
But isn't there a bug somewhere if M-; does not do the right thing?
However M-; work in most cases. So if it's a bug, it come from python-mode, because M-; normally have to be used with python.el (is it working with python.el ?) because it is the normal mode to use in emacs with python even if IMHO python-mode is much better.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |