[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What I'm missing when using M-x shell
From: |
Dan Espen |
Subject: |
Re: What I'm missing when using M-x shell |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:42:15 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) XEmacs/21.4 (Educational Television, i686-pc-linux) |
"Francis Moreau" <francis.moro@gmail.com> writes:
> [ please CC me when replying to me ]
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Dan Espen
> <daneNO@more.mk.spamtelcordia.com> wrote:
>> Compiles are M-x compile, greps are M-x grep,
>> ls is dired, email is MH-E.
>
> But what would you suggest as replacement for:
>
> $ make && gdb || mail -s "Compilation failed" home
First, the make is always run as M-x compile.
In my case, the most likely outcome from M-x compile is
that I'll be correcting syntax errors. Since I've run
M-x compile, M-x next-error becomes really useful.
So, no make from the command line for me.
I'm got a big fan of running under gdb.
If I did want to run under gdb a lot, I'd probably figure out
Emacs gdb.
Typically my make target is not just a compile but a compile
and test and check results. No need to send myself
an email since the M-x compile clearly shows whether the
compile/test worked.
Message not available
Re: What I'm missing when using M-x shell, Oleksandr Gavenko, 2008/09/12
Re: What I'm missing when using M-x shell, rustom, 2008/09/13