[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x C-b (switch-to-buffer) smarter suggestions?
From: |
Jorgen Grahn |
Subject: |
Re: C-x C-b (switch-to-buffer) smarter suggestions? |
Date: |
7 Feb 2010 22:54:14 GMT |
User-agent: |
slrn/pre0.9.9-111 (Linux) |
On Sun, 2010-02-07, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jorgen Grahn writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> But this doesn't complete to foo.h, because foo.c is also an
>> alternative -- even though that's the buffer I'm explicitly trying to
>> switch *from*.
>
> Take a look at ff-find-other-file.
("Find the header or source file corresponding to this file")
Thanks. Yes, that solves the particular example above. Not the
general case though -- the buffers might equally well be foo.cc and
foo.1 (for the manual page) or Makefile and Makefile<2>. Come to
think of it, that last example is probably the one that annoys me the
most.
/Jorgen
--
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . .
\X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
- Re: C-x C-b (switch-to-buffer) smarter suggestions?, (continued)
Re: C-x C-b (switch-to-buffer) smarter suggestions?, Dmitri Minaev, 2010/02/08
Message not available
- Re: C-x C-b (switch-to-buffer) smarter suggestions?,
Jorgen Grahn <=
Re: C-x C-b (switch-to-buffer) smarter suggestions?, Kevin Rodgers, 2010/02/08
Message not available
Message not available