[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs vs Scrivener
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs vs Scrivener |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:11:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
drain <aeuster@gmail.com> writes:
> Xavier Maillard-8 wrote
>> We are on a GNU mailing list. Why do you want to promote such (privative?)
>> software here ?
>
> Any promotion is incidental to the question, which aims to discover missing
> Emacs figures: crucial to expanding and improving it, and attracting new
> users, perhaps users of Scrivener.
I agree this could be useful.
The best way to have a constructive discussion about features in other
(free or proprietary) text editors is to start by pointing at one feature
that you like and don't have (or don't know) in GNU Emacs.
--
Bastien
- Emacs vs Scrivener, drain, 2012/11/19
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Susan Cragin, 2012/11/19
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Xavier Maillard, 2012/11/20
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, drain, 2012/11/20
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener,
Bastien <=
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/21
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/22
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Burton Samograd, 2012/11/22
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/26
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, William Gardella, 2012/11/27
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Bastien, 2012/11/24
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Eric Abrahamsen, 2012/11/24
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/26
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Oleksandr Gavenko, 2012/11/25
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Bastien, 2012/11/26