[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Nov 2013 08:57:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:
> So, the original Orgmode which was started out as an
> evening walk turned in to a pleasant jog and
> occasionally became a fartlek (with a mix of
> intensive workouts interspersed with plain walk)
Ha ha, so you know about that. "Fartlek" is Swedish:
fart = speed, and lek = game (or "play" perhaps).
> People who have a sense of history - those who have
> seen a oak tree - in a frivolous seed - add water and
> remove weeds and more importantly refrain from
> uprooting the seed out of the soil.
Absolutely, that's correct.
> So, try it out or just note it in diary. Someone who
> proposes may be weak heart and may never start out
> his journey if he finds no encouragement.
Yeah, but in your reasoning and those examples, I don't
see how that applies because I'm not opposed to such
projects. I'm opposed to the projects like openArtist,
which a described, but what I can see that project is
*the opposite* of the projects you describe (new stuff:
Org-mode, EmacsWiki, and the Elisp manual).
But I enjoyed reading that, so thanks.
--
Emanuel Berg, programmer-for-rent. CV, projects, etc at uXu
underground experts united: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, (continued)
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Rustom Mody, 2013/11/28
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/28
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Rustom Mody, 2013/11/29
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/29
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/30
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/30
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/30
- Message not available
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/30
Message not availableRe: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations,
Emanuel Berg <=
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/30
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Yuri Khan, 2013/11/29
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/29
Message not availableRe: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/29
Message not availableRe: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/29
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Rustom Mody, 2013/11/29
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/29