[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations

From: Emanuel Berg
Subject: Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 08:57:32 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)

Jambunathan K <> writes:

> So, the original Orgmode which was started out as an
> evening walk turned in to a pleasant jog and
> occasionally became a fartlek (with a mix of
> intensive workouts interspersed with plain walk)

Ha ha, so you know about that. "Fartlek" is Swedish:
fart = speed, and lek = game (or "play" perhaps).

> People who have a sense of history - those who have
> seen a oak tree - in a frivolous seed - add water and
> remove weeds and more importantly refrain from
> uprooting the seed out of the soil.

Absolutely, that's correct.

> So, try it out or just note it in diary.  Someone who
> proposes may be weak heart and may never start out
> his journey if he finds no encouragement.

Yeah, but in your reasoning and those examples, I don't
see how that applies because I'm not opposed to such
projects. I'm opposed to the projects like openArtist,
which a described, but what I can see that project is
*the opposite* of the projects you describe (new stuff:
Org-mode, EmacsWiki, and the Elisp manual).

But I enjoyed reading that, so thanks.

Emanuel Berg, programmer-for-rent. CV, projects, etc at uXu
underground experts united:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]