[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Always using let*
|
From: |
Cecil Westerhof |
|
Subject: |
Always using let* |
|
Date: |
Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:46:31 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Would it be OK to always use let*? I was just bitten by the fact that
with let you can not previous variables from the let statement, as is
possible with setq. So I am thinking about always using let*, so I do
not have to think about it. Or are there good reasons to use let when
you do not need let*?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
- Always using let*,
Cecil Westerhof <=
- RE: Always using let*, Drew Adams, 2014/09/14
- RE: Always using let*, Drew Adams, 2014/09/15
- Message not available
- Re: Always using let*, Cecil Westerhof, 2014/09/15
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/15
- Re: Always using let*, Cecil Westerhof, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*, Cecil Westerhof, 2014/09/18
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/18
Message not available