[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Always using let*
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Always using let* |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:18:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> You mean "let, and not let*?" Because I use let all
>> the time and I don't think that is uncommon.
>
> No, I don't think I made a typo: you could remove
> `let' from Elisp and it would be pretty easy to
> rewrite all the code to use let* instead. In 99% of
> the cases it's just a matter of adding a *.
Yes, that's what I mean, you mean, let and only let
(i.e., not let*), because let's functionality is
covered by let* as well.
--
underground experts united
- Re: Always using let*, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Always using let*, sokobania . 01, 2014/09/16
- RE: Always using let*, Drew Adams, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/16
- Message not available
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*,
Emanuel Berg <=
Re: Always using let*, Joe Fineman, 2014/09/14
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Message not availableRe: Always using let*, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/14
Re: Always using let*, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2014/09/14