[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:50:44 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Question: Does anyone know of a package to get that
> sweet look?
Install debian-el and it will include apt-sources mode. It has syntax
highlighting and other mode specific keybindinds for editing various
Debian files.
$ apt-cache show debian-el
Description-en: Emacs helpers specific to Debian users
This package contains:
.
apt-sources - major mode for editing Debian sources.list files;
apt-utils - interface to APT (Debian package management);
debian-bug - an Emacs command to submit a bug report;
deb-view - view contents of Debian package, similarly to tar-mode;
gnus-BTS - provides buttons for bug numbers seen in Gnus messages;
preseed - major mode for editing debian-installer preseed files.
.
See /usr/share/doc/debian-el/README.Debian for a short description of
all files, or the Info node `debian-el' for details.
Here are the various related packages in the emacs-goodies-el source.
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/emacs-goodies-el
Bob
- evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/15
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs,
Bob Proulx <=
- Message not available
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, H. Dieter Wilhelm, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs, Dan Espen, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs, Dan Espen, 2014/11/17
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/17
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, saint, 2014/11/17
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Yuri Khan, 2014/11/17
- Message not available
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/17