[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no C-h i m emacs ??
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: no C-h i m emacs ?? |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:51:58 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Alternatively if GNU were to release the info pages without the
> requirement of invariant sections then those docs could be packaged in
> the free section.
As you know, that is a fundamental policy disagreement that is just
never going to change.
Whereas providing stub info pages is a trivial technical matter that
would probably take about 5 minutes. Just make a package that conflicts
with the real info pages. I don't know, I'm not a Debian packager.
I'm sure it's not impossible.
But obviously this is a very old topic and talking about it here does
nothing.
Message not available
Message not availableRe: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??), Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/18
RE: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??), Subhan Michael Tindall, 2014/11/19
Re: manual activism (was: Re: no C-h i m emacs ??), Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro, 2014/11/18