[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sudo make install
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: sudo make install |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:57:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hello Bob,
Thanks for explaining all these details. I think I'll try to rely on
the symbolic representation.
> So they set the umask explicitly to 022 there. Hmm... Not so
> friendly doing that there. It overrides what the user has set.
As you expected, that is not really a problem in my specific case.
Anyway, it doesn't seem right.
Would something like "umask g+r,g+x,o+r,o+x" work better in the
Makefile? This would avoid to make the umask more restictive in the 002
case.
> Whew! Long message!
Indeed. Many thanks for your answer!
Regards,
Michael.
- Re: sudo make install, (continued)
- Re: sudo make install, Bob Proulx, 2015/04/16
- Re: sudo make install, Michael Heerdegen, 2015/04/16
- Re: sudo make install, Bob Proulx, 2015/04/16
- Re: sudo make install, Michael Heerdegen, 2015/04/17
- Re: sudo make install, Bob Proulx, 2015/04/18
- Re: sudo make install, Michael Heerdegen, 2015/04/19
- Re: sudo make install, Bob Proulx, 2015/04/19
- Re: sudo make install,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- Re: sudo make install, Bob Proulx, 2015/04/20