[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Speck (Spell checker for Emacs)
From: |
Sebastien Vauban |
Subject: |
Re: Speck (Spell checker for Emacs) |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:57:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (windows-nt) |
Alexander Shukaev wrote:
>>
>> Initially, speck was written without Hunspell support. I added it as
>> soon as the first executables for Windows appeared (that was quite some
>> time before any other Emacs Spell Checker was able to talk to Hunspell).
>> The customization variables are still from that early period, there was
>> no "normal" installation procedure at that time IIRC. Moreover, I never
>> upgraded my spell engines since then. So probably support is missing or
>> incorrect in this area.
>
>
> ​What I wonder is why Speck is not so popular, it seems not so many people
> use it or even know about it. What do others use for spell checking?
> Flyspell? Personally, I have to admit that my experiences with Flyspell
> are terrible as it is extremely slow and continuously stutters Emacs. Even
> `flyspell-lazy' does not help. On the other hand, Speck seems to be
> working truly (or almost truly) asynchronously and therefore I experience
> no stutters or slowdowns.
Speaking for myself (truism ;-)), I use flyspell when typing and I don't
experience any slowdown.
Of course, changing the language will take some time, depending on the
buffer length. Changing the language to FR. Back to English!
Demo: http://screencast.com/t/u3Y3XjBR7s.
Another reason for me to use Flyspell was its availability on Windows as
well, and Speck seemed complex to correctly tune when I looked at it,
but that (or I) may have changed...
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
- Re: Speck (Spell checker for Emacs), (continued)
Re: Speck (Spell checker for Emacs), martin rudalics, 2015/04/21
Message not available
- Re: Speck (Spell checker for Emacs),
Sebastien Vauban <=
Re: Speck (Spell checker for Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/21