|
From: | Emanuel Berg |
Subject: | Re: Real-life examples of lexical binding in Emacs Lisp |
Date: | Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:47:57 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> writes: >> I'm curious, the techno-science books always speak >> of LISP as a language for "symbolic manipulation". > > I really wish they'd get on with the times and start > speaking of "Lisp" instead of "LISP". Is there an agreed-upon rule what is what? I use "LISP" in the context of the history and origin of the technology but I don't have a defined endpoint at what time history gives way to your everyday "Lisp". -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |