[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Check for redundancy
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Check for redundancy |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 00:48:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:
> I agree that for high-level, general-purpose
> languages, HN is rarely a good idea. (Though some
> variants, like consistent naming schemes - like
> Emacs' convention for variables ending in
> ‘-function’ or ‘-hook’ - are fine, aren’t they?)
I never used -function but -hook is good because then
you can often know the name of a hook by putting the
pieces together. They are also good for searching
which is the same reason for them being useful in
those hideous GUI makers. Yes, that is interesting.
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Check for redundancy, Andreas Röhler, 2015/06/24
- RE: Check for redundancy, Drew Adams, 2015/06/24
- Re: Check for redundancy, Andreas Röhler, 2015/06/24
- Message not available
- Re: Check for redundancy, Stefan Monnier, 2015/06/24
- Re: Check for redundancy, tomas, 2015/06/24
- Re: Check for redundancy, Stefan Monnier, 2015/06/24
- Re: Check for redundancy, tomas, 2015/06/25
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/26
- Re: Check for redundancy, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/06/26
- Re: Check for redundancy,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: Check for redundancy, Robert Thorpe, 2015/06/27
- Re: Check for redundancy, tomas, 2015/06/27
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/27
- Re: Check for redundancy, tomas, 2015/06/28
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/28
- Re: Check for redundancy, Yuri Khan, 2015/06/28
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/28
- Re: Check for redundancy, Robert Thorpe, 2015/06/28
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/28
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/24