[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (interactive) call or form?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: (interactive) call or form? |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Apr 2018 06:32:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> During the discussion, I started to think:
> can an "interactive form" (i.e., the thing
> that makes a function a command) be called an
> "interactive call"?
The technical term is "special form",
a primitive function (i.e. written in C, but
callable from Lisp) that has its own rules for
evaluating its arguments.
(special-form-p #'interactive) ; t
(special-form-p #'special-form-p) ; nil
Use the source, Luke! `interactive' is in
callint.c .
> the article about Emacs and TeX is in the
> final stage of proof-reading.
Great, post it here as well when its 100% done!
> (In case you didn't know, folks at the
> TUGboat are _extremely_ good copyeditors, and
> they caught _a lot_ of
> typos/grammar/stylistic mistakes in the
> paper!)
That's normal. If it isn't like that, something
is wrong with you...
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: (interactive) call or form?,
Emanuel Berg <=