help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What happens with text properties in batch mode?


From: Marcin Borkowski
Subject: Re: What happens with text properties in batch mode?
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2018 21:08:53 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50

On 2018-12-08, at 19:31, andlind@gmail.com <andlind@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Friday, 7 December 2018 08:58:38 UTC+1, Marcin Borkowski  wrote:
>
>> it seems that when I `princ' something with text properties (e.g.,
>> colored faces) in batch mode, the colors disappear.  Is it documented
>> anywhere?  Can I disable this behavior?
>
> Can you tell me what you are trying to accomplish? Simply printing a 
> highlighted text stdout and expecting it to be shown with colors doesn't work.

I was just curious what happens to the properties after princ.

>> I found this: https://github.com/Lindydancer/e2ansi, and its existence
>> suggests that outputting colored stuff (using ANSI codes) is
>> non-trivial.  Am I right?
>
> It is non-trivial, I can assure you, I spent many months writing it.
>
> One problem is that even though strings have face properties in batch mode, 
> the faces themselves often fail to specify anything useful in batch mode. 
> e2ansi contains a system for playing the "what if" game by allowing you to 
> query things like "what would face X look like when in a gui with 16 millions 
> colors, or in a black-and-white tty". (This part is placed in a stand alone 
> library "face-explorer", along with tons of useful tools.)
>
> The second problem is to translate the face information to ANSI. Note that 
> Emacs internal system for rendering things in terminal mode is not available 
> to elisp, so I had to implement everything from scratch.
>
> Fortunately, you can use e2ansi as a library in your own packages. For 
> example `e2ansi-string-to-ansi' converts a string with face information to 
> ANSI. See `face-explorer-number-of-colors' and friends to control which 
> features of ANSI will be used. (They have sane defaults, though.)

Thanks a lot for the details (and for e2ansi)!  I'll try to look into it some 
day.

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]