|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: Is Elisp really that slow? |
Date: | Wed, 15 May 2019 19:05:43 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 |
On 15.05.2019 18:51, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
AFAIK, modes where C-c C-c does something do not support the concept of commenting regions. elisp-mode, for instance.
If you meant ielm (elisp-mode has no C-c C-c), then C-; works there and even does something. REPLs can have multiline inputs too.
And, as already mentioned, comment-dwim is not an alternative to comment-region. They do different things.You ignore, like, half the things I write. I am out of this discussion.I do not understand your frustration.
Because, even with the paragraph below, you haven't addressed my response on that subject. And it was a one-line response, FFS.
Anyway, Stefan has written a more expanded message on the same subject.
The heuristics of comment-dwim not always gives the desired results. If I know that I want to comment or uncomment a region, I prefer a method that will do precisely that instead of something that tries to guess my intention and can end doing the opposite thing depending on the presence of commented-out text somewhere on the region.
I don't see you arguing for adding a comment-region binding in other major modes.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |