[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Elisp really that slow?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Is Elisp really that slow? |
Date: |
Wed, 22 May 2019 09:13:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Ergus wrote:
> In 1992 there were less alternatives around
> and most of them were uglier, notably more
> limited or most expensive. But in 2019 there
> are cheaper, prettier and free alternatives.
> They are not as powerful as emacs, but they
> are more ergonomic
I didn't start using Emacs in 1992 - you did?!
- but rather around 2008-10-17, that is
10y 7m 5d, or if you'd like, 3869 days
ago :) [1]
Emacs is free, and free of charge, and the
prettiest software ever. [2]
As for ergonomics the configuration
possibilities makes Emacs the most ergonomic
software as well. The mouse-free style of most
Emacs' hackers is also more ergonomic than the
"click and play" of much other software.
Emacs would be even more ergonomic
out-of-the-box if the default background color
was black and the cursor didn't blink by
default. (At least in the GUI Emacs, that _is_
an Emacs thing, right? In the Linux VTs, one
has to disable that outside of Emacs.)
[1] line 43 @ https://dataswamp.org/~incal/conf/.zsh/time
[2] https://dataswamp.org/~incal/figures/emacs/emacs-cpp.png
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/05/16
Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Ergus, 2019/05/15
Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Ergus, 2019/05/15
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?,
Emanuel Berg <=