[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs as a translator's tool
From: |
Jean-Christophe Helary |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs as a translator's tool |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:28:57 +0900 |
> On Jun 10, 2020, at 10:39, Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text
> editor <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
>
>> Sure. You may want to take a look at the standard.
>
> Do you have the actual set of rules?
>
> I found this quote:
>
> SRX make use of the ICU Regular Expression
> syntax,^[3] but not all programming languages
> support all ICU expressions, making implementing
> SRX in some languages difficult or impossible.
> Java is an example of this. [1]
>
> Heh, poor Java, well if I had the rules I'm pretty
> confident we can implement them in one form or
> another...
>
> And I found a list
>
> * Pangolin is a free open-source SRX editor.
> <https://github.com/davidmason/Pangolin>
Interesting. Web based and based on Ratel (below)
> * Ratel is a free open-source and cross-platform
> application to create and maintain SRX 2.0 files [...]
> <http://okapiframework.org/wiki/index.php?title=Ratel>
The Okapi Framework should really be in Debian :) Some of its main contributors
were editors for related standards.
> * SRXEditor is a free open source cross-platform
> editor of segmentation rules by Maxprograms,
> designed to use Segmentation Rules eXchange (SRX) 2.0.
> <http://www.maxprograms.com/products/srxeditor.html> [1]
Maxprograms has been releasing its code as FOSS for a little while, only
charging for the installers. The main developer was editor for a few related
standards.
I mentioned both Okapi and Maxprograms in the mail where I wrote about the
processes.
> None of that is in the Debian repos what I can
> see...
>
> No mention of SRX in the [M]ELPAs and no (?) good
> Google hits for Emacs and SRX.
Not really surprising.
> Is it this file: [2] Then why the archive link? (from
> the SRXEditor page, see URL above) Is this standard
> obsoleted or unofficial, perhaps?
SRX is not obsolete or unofficial, LISA has been disbanded, in 2011.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Localization_Industry_Standards_Association
Jean-Christophe
>
>
> [1]
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRX_Segmentation_Rules_eXchage_LISA_OSCAR_XML_based_Standard
> [2]
> http://web.archive.org/web/20090709131535/http://www.lisa.org/fileadmin/standards/srx20.html
>
> --
> underground experts united
> http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal
>
>
--
Jean-Christophe Helary @brandelune
http://mac4translators.blogspot.com
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, (continued)
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Marcin Borkowski, 2020/06/08
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Emanuel Berg, 2020/06/08
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Emanuel Berg, 2020/06/08
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Emanuel Berg, 2020/06/08
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/06/08
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Emanuel Berg, 2020/06/09
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/06/09
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Emanuel Berg, 2020/06/09
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/06/09
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Emanuel Berg, 2020/06/09
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool,
Jean-Christophe Helary <=
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Emanuel Berg, 2020/06/09
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/06/09
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Emanuel Berg, 2020/06/10
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/06/10
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Emanuel Berg, 2020/06/10
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/06/10
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Emanuel Berg, 2020/06/10
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Marcin Borkowski, 2020/06/08
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Emanuel Berg, 2020/06/08
- Re: Emacs as a translator's tool, Marcin Borkowski, 2020/06/09