[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non-nil not valid any more?
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: non-nil not valid any more? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jun 2020 22:23:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:18:26PM -0700, Drew Adams wrote:
> > > > >> Isn't `t` an obsolete alias for `non-nil`?
> > > > > Not obsolete. It's already removed in master.
> > > >
> > > > ... which was hence renamed `maser`.
> > >
> > > So `masnon-niler' is no longer supported? ;-)
> >
> > Hey, folks -- you managed to confuse the hell out of me ;-)
>
> Sorry. I think Stefan was making a joke about
> the letter `t' having been removed. Mine was
> just to replace `t' with `non-nil'. Ignore...
No need to apologize: though initially confused, I had my fun, too :)
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- non-nil not valid any more?, Andreas Röhler, 2020/06/11
- Re: non-nil not valid any more?, tomas, 2020/06/11
- Re: non-nil not valid any more?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/06/11
- Re: non-nil not valid any more?, Michael Albinus, 2020/06/11
- Re: non-nil not valid any more?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/06/11
- RE: non-nil not valid any more?, Drew Adams, 2020/06/11
- Re: non-nil not valid any more?, tomas, 2020/06/11
- RE: non-nil not valid any more?, Drew Adams, 2020/06/11
- Re: non-nil not valid any more?,
tomas <=
- Re: non-nil not valid any more?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/06/11
- Re: non-nil not valid any more?, tomas, 2020/06/12
- Re: non-nil not valid any more?, Michael Heerdegen, 2020/06/13
Re: non-nil not valid any more?, Michael Heerdegen, 2020/06/11