Re: Compiling a recursive macro

[Douglas Lewan]

On 6/11/20 5:32 PM, Michael Heerdegen wrote:
> Douglas Lewan <d.lewan2000@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > (defmacro mmm ()
> >      (cond ((at-root-p)
> >             do  tree-wide stuff)
> >            (t
> >             (with-current-buffer root (mmm)))
> That really looks like this shouldn't be a macro.  Why do you want this
> to be a macro?
The macro itself has to establish a new variable for each buffer in the 
tree of buffers. It's somehow not natural (to me) to pass 'new-var to a 
defun that's supposed to act like (defvar).

--
,Doug
d.lewan2000@gmail.com
(908) 720 7908

If this is what winning looks like, I'd hate to see what losing is.