[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Quote by Knuth
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Quote by Knuth |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:58:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jean Louis wrote:
> For majority of Emacs packages that is really not necessary
> as there are documentation strings or docstrings.
For it to be literate programming you would stop programming
in the conventional sense, instead you would write in what is
much closer to a natural language, all that you'd write would
look like for example English but is actually _macro code_
which describes the problem to be solved, then that is
compiled into _actual_ source code that, in turn, solves
the problem.
So in the Emacs world, literate programming would not be
docstrings but macros...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Quote by Knuth, (continued)
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/15
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Marcin Borkowski, 2021/07/17
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Jean Louis, 2021/07/18
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Jean Louis, 2021/07/18
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/18
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/20
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/20
- Re: Quote by Knuth,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/20
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/18
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/20
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/14
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/14
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/14
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/15