Re: [External] : messages to *Messages* without appearing in mini-buffer?

[Emanuel Berg]

Michael Heerdegen wrote:

>> Still ... IMO a dedicated function is better than setting
>> variable back and forth if you plan to use this a lot.
>
> You typically bind the variable, and since it's special, it
> can silence calls to `message' in code you call that calls
> `message'.

Best:

  (do-some-thing)

Second best:

  (do-some-thing this-way)

Not 3rd place:

  (let ((control-behavior with-some-value))
    (in-function) )

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal