Re: Making a function than can only be used interactively

[Christopher Dimech]

Jul 4, 2022, 13:21 by monnier@iro.umontreal.ca:

>        "interactive-only" should go far beyond a byte-compilation warning.
>
>        I suggest that "interactive-only" does actually make the function work
>       in an interactive-only way.
>
>>>
>>>    What would be the benefit?
>>>
>>>    Stefan

That it would do what it says.  Defining a function `interactive-only` would 
only work
interactively.  Currently, even with `interactive-only` the function would 
still run as
if `interactive-only` did not exist.  Currently it does not seem to me that 
`interactive-only`
has any operational effect.