[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dired cons bug?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: dired cons bug? |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:50:12 +0300 |
> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:23:52 +0200
> From: Harald Judt <h.judt@gmx.at>
>
> I have found an explanation for my own question: The problem is that after a
> dired-do-xxxx command, the buffer of the _target_ directory will be
> refreshed.
> But the target directory of /home/user/tmp/test/a/a would be
> /home/user/tmp/test/a/, and that is different from the one used in the base
> dir of the cons (/home/user/). In fact, if I add a file /home/user/x and add
> that to the file list and delete it, the buffer will be reverted correctly.
> If
> I delete any of the other files, it won't.
>
> Now, what could I do to programmatically revert the current dired buffer
> after
> executing a dired-do command?
I have posted a patch that's supposed to fix this. Please try it.