[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The next exercise
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: The next exercise |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Dec 2022 22:29:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> writes:
> I suspect some trap here but okay then
I hope I'm not that bad.
> I'll bite
>
> (substring (format "%d" (expt 1001 1000)) 0 3)
>
> which is 271
Indeed!
Seems a lot of people already know that `expt' and even `format' alone
are totally able to handle the task.
Michael.
- Re: The next exercise, (continued)
- Re: The next exercise, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/12/15
- Re: The next exercise, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/12/15
- Re: The next exercise, Emanuel Berg, 2022/12/17
- Re: The next exercise, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/12/17
- Re: The next exercise, Emanuel Berg, 2022/12/20
- Re: The next exercise, Andy Moreton, 2022/12/11
- Re: The next exercise, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/12/11
- Re: The next exercise, Emanuel Berg, 2022/12/15
- Re: The next exercise, Emanuel Berg, 2022/12/10
Re: The next exercise, Emanuel Berg, 2022/12/09
- Re: The next exercise,
Michael Heerdegen <=