[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Closures - do you understand them well?
|
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
|
Subject: |
Re: Closures - do you understand them well? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jan 2023 13:13:19 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Michael Heerdegen wrote:
>>> The expansion of (push `(lambda () ,i) funs) is
>> ^^^
>> It was the "poor human's closure" in pre-lexical times,
>> after all.
>
> I wonder if that's a reason why lambda expressions where
> originally made to be treated as functions.
Why should the not be, aren't they anonymous functions?
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal