Re: [External] : forward-sexp

[Andreas Röhler]

Am 12.08.23 um 22:41 schrieb Drew Adams:
> > > As I said, it all depends on how `forward-sexp' is defined
> > > [...]

While every mode is entitled to design commands at their needs, it
must respect semantic.

‘sexp’ is documented as ‘balanced expression’.

If an expression starts with an [, I'm holding its balancing
counterpart as obvious. No ( or other char may come into scope.