[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-gnucap] Strange behaviour on .model definition, a bug?

From: al davis
Subject: Re: [Help-gnucap] Strange behaviour on .model definition, a bug?
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:46:02 -0400
User-agent: KMail/1.9.5

On Monday 12 March 2007 16:24, Rubén Gómez Antolí wrote:
> Again, Let's go to modify .model:
> .model Q2N3055  NPN (Is=974.4f Xti=3 Eg=1.11 Vaf=50 Bf=99.49 Ne=1.941
> +               Ise=902.5p Ikf=4.029 Xtb=1.5 Br=2.949 Nc=2
> *+ Isc=0 Ikr=0

-- commented out

> +               Rc=.1 Cjc=276p Vjc=.75 Mjc=.3333 Fc=.5 Cje=569.1p Vje=.75

-- this extends the previous line,which is a comment.
Therefore this is a comment too!

> +               Mje=.3333 Tr=971.7n Tf=39.11n Itf=20 Vtf=10 Xtf=2 Rb=.1)
> *               Texas Inst.     pid=2N3055      case=TO3

Known bug ..  or .. known difference from the way Spice is actually implemented,
as opposed to the way it is speced.

Work around:  don't comment out pieces in the middle of a model.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]