Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation [News for an old discussion]

[Brian Gough]

At Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:52:39 +0200,
José Luis García Pallero wrote:
> Ouch, I had sent a new version of the patch just when you applied the
> former one, but the mail didn't appears in the mailing list at time.
> In the new version I've splitted the error checking in three files:
> one for the common macros (check dimensions, stride, etc) and two more
> with the macros containing the level-2 and level-3 blas. I think that
> this is useful in order to manage the level-2 and level-3 macros
> independently. I had sent two patches: one for the level-2 and other
> for the level-3. See my previous mail for details. Can you revert the
> changes for the former patch?

Ok, I'll redo it.