[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Seeking advice: preparing releases on GuixSD.

From: Ricardo Wurmus
Subject: Re: Seeking advice: preparing releases on GuixSD.
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:23:32 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 25.1.1

ng0 <address@hidden> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>> ng0 <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> What I get is a tarball named “gnurl--.tar.gz” (because “”
>>>> specifies the version as a dash).  Unpacking it I see exactly *one*
>>>> reference to something in /gnu/store and that’s in “”.
>>> Hm.. that's what I had too before I asked here, I just felt there
>>> must be 0 occurences of /gnu/store.
>> You wrote earlier:
>>> 3. Simply remove all occurences of any /gnu/store/… (if it's
>>>    that simple) which could also happen in (2).
>> That made it sound like there are countless references that need to be
>> corrected somehow.
> Well in 7.52.0 there are more than 1 reference to /gnu/store, and
> in 7.52.1 there were more than in 7.52.0 simply because I did not
> have the time to investigate what's wrong now.

If you did what I did on GuixSD (exact sequence in my previous email) I
don’t see how there could have been any more references to store items.

>> “” is instantiated from a template by libtool.  It originally
>> contains a /bin/sh shebang, and I think it should not be patched when
>> installed to
> So I can assume that just changing the shebang in back
> to /bin/sh is enough to make it distributable again, or is
> something distributions have anyway and the local file
> is "just there"? is included by “make dist”, so it’s supposed to be
distributed.  One of the big ideas of autotools is that users don’t have
to have autotools to build a release tarball.


GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]