[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output

From: Olivier Dion
Subject: Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:53:00 -0400

On Fri, 29 Apr 2022, Ricardo Wurmus <> wrote:
> Exactly the same way.  The first argument to WITH-CHANNELS would be
> (cons C G) and thus P and D would be picked from the set of C and G.  C
> and G can be specified with exact commits or branches, just like the
> --channels option to “guix time-machine”.
> We already have all the tools for WITH-CHANNELS — that’s (guix
> inferior).  We just don’t have a convenient syntax to do this without a
> lot of boilerplate.

Right.  It would be great I think.  However, time-machine does the job
for now, at least for my case.  But it would definitely allow for better
channel granularity.  To continue!

Olivier Dion

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]