[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix as a native-inputs ?
From: |
Olivier Dion |
Subject: |
Re: Guix as a native-inputs ? |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Aug 2022 11:51:30 -0400 |
On Tue, 02 Aug 2022, Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu> wrote:
> I suppose once you get information about these channels, you could
> create an inferior with these channels, and evaluate your package in
> it.
I think I will have to go with your proposal. I already have the
packages defined in my channel. It's just a matter of making a list of
them and adding it to the native-inputs instead of using Guix. However,
this mean that I have to copy these packages when adding my package
to Guix channel. It's not too much of a hassle.
--
Olivier Dion
oldiob.dev
- Guix as a native-inputs ?, Olivier Dion, 2022/08/01
- Re: Guix as a native-inputs ?, (, 2022/08/01
- Re: Guix as a native-inputs ?, Olivier Dion, 2022/08/02
- Re: Guix as a native-inputs ?, (, 2022/08/02
- Re: Guix as a native-inputs ?, Olivier Dion, 2022/08/02
- Re: Guix as a native-inputs ?, Julien Lepiller, 2022/08/02
- Re: Guix as a native-inputs ?, Olivier Dion, 2022/08/02
- Re: Guix as a native-inputs ?, Julien Lepiller, 2022/08/02
- Re: Guix as a native-inputs ?,
Olivier Dion <=
Re: Guix as a native-inputs ?, (, 2022/08/01
Re: Guix as a native-inputs ?, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2022/08/01