Re: Help packaging R Quarto Cli

[Sébastien Rey-Coyrehourcq]

Hi,

Wojtek Kosior <koszko@koszko.org> writes:

>> Hi,
>>
>> I continue the packaging using guix import crate, this is a slow process, 
>> but everything goes well at this time.
>>
>> My file deno.scm contain 6000 line, with all packages imported, this is a 
>> problem because i need to remove duplicate.
>> The best way was probably to export all `(define public method … )`  into a 
>> folder with corresponding library.scm.
>
> Do you have wour work-in-progress in some public repo? This would make
> us easier to understand your setup and would also allow more ppl to
> cooperate (although unfortunately Idk if there’s anyone else who’s
> particularly interested in deno at this particular moment).
>

Here we are : <https://git.sr.ht/~reyman/build-deno-script>

This is a wip python script that build an `export/' directory containing all 
rust module needed to compile deno (i suppose)

The deno script is localized at the root of `export/' folder

I build the modules folders, but know i don’t know how to compile all this 
folders correctly using correct path …
Any guile help appreciated to do that !

For example, the module *./export/rust-ecdsa-0.14/rust-ecdsa-0.14.scm* need a 
module localized to *./export/rust-serdect-0.1/rust-serdect-0.1.scm*

I simply try *#:use-module (../rust-serdect-01)* in *rust-ecdsa-0.14* 
define-module but this probably not the good way.

>> I need to create a module by package do you thing ? and after that import 
>> all the package using `use-modules` ?
>
> From what I’ve seen, Guix package definitions are usually grouped into
> modules thematically. Although until you actually try upstreaming your
> work, you’re not bound by any reqs and you can structure the
> definitions in a way that’s comfortable for you.
>
> Also, are you adding your package by modifying the actual Guix sources?
> Or by creating modules outsite of these? Perhaps this was already
> metioned but I don’t have previous emails on the top…
>

If that works locally i suppose i could sent a patch with all the rust modules 
needed to build Deno ?

Best !
SR.

> Good luck :)
> Wojtek
>
> – (sig_start)
> website: <https://koszko.org/koszko.html>
> PGP: <https://koszko.org/key.gpg>
> fingerprint: E972 7060 E3C5 637C 8A4F  4B42 4BC5 221C 5A79 FD1A
>
> Meet Kraków saints!           #33: blessed Antonin Bajewski
> Poznaj świętych krakowskich!  #33: błogosławiony Antonin Bajewski
> <https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonin_Bajewski>
> – (sig_end)
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:05:52 +0200
> Sébastien Rey-Coyrehourcq <sebastien.rey-coyrehourcq@univ-rouen.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I continue the packaging using guix import crate, this is a slow process, 
>> but everything goes well at this time.
>>
>> My file deno.scm contain 6000 line, with all packages imported, this is a 
>> problem because i need to remove duplicate.
>> The best way was probably to export all `(define public method … )`  into a 
>> folder with corresponding library.scm.
>>
>> I need to create a module by package do you thing ? and after that import 
>> all the package using `use-modules` ?
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Wojtek Kosior <koszko@koszko.org> writes:
>>
>>
>> >> > Out of curiosity - what are the problems between Guix and JS? When I
>> >> > read this my first suspicion was that maybe TS is a self-hosted
>> >> > language and cannot be bootstrapped. However, when I ran `guix search
>> >> > typescript`, it revealed the existence of some TS->JS compiler called
>> >> > ’rust-swc’. So I guess problems lie somewhere else, right?
>> >>
>> >> Nothing per se.  Note that «TypeScript is a strongly typed programming
>> >> language that builds on JavaScript» and from my understanding (maybe I
>> >> am wrong?), it is hard to package Javascript for Guix because the
>> >> Javascript ecosystem is messy.  Janneke provides some explanations [1]
>> >> and I am not convinced the situation have changed since then.  Maybe I
>> >> am wrong…
>> >>
>> >> 1: <https://yhetil.org/guix/87fudzndu7.fsf@gnu.org>
>> >
>> > A few months ago (I think) I did run some code to actually check what
>> > the dependency tree of the protocol buffers JS library (from npm) is.
>> > The tree of runtime deps wasn’t horribly big. The tree of
>> > recursively-computed dev deps was, on the other hand, as bad as
>> > described by Janneke or even worse… However, It seems in most cases
>> > many of those packages designated as dev deps are not strictly needed
>> > for actually building stuff. Some are just test dependencies. Others
>> > were perhaps put there because developers understood “dev dependencies”
>> > differently from how packagers understand it…
>> >
>> > Anyway, it seems the only way to check what the situation really is is
>> > to actually try packaging something. I’m confident it will be way
>> > easier than it seems :)
>> >
>> > Luckily for Sébastien, it seems quarto-cli - although written mostly in
>> > JS/TS - has no NPM deps. Or at least I don’t see any…
>> >
>> > Wojtek
>> >
>> > – (sig_start)
>> > website: <https://koszko.org/koszko.html>
>> > PGP: <https://koszko.org/key.gpg>
>> > fingerprint: E972 7060 E3C5 637C 8A4F  4B42 4BC5 221C 5A79 FD1A
>> >
>> > Meet Kraków saints!           #15: saint Jan Paweł II
>> > Poznaj świętych krakowskich!  #15: święty Jan Paweł II
>> > <https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Paweł_II>
>> > – (sig_end)
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:08:59 +0200
>> > zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 20:40, Wojtek Kosior via <help-guix@gnu.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Out of curiosity - what are the problems between Guix and JS? When I
>> >> > read this my first suspicion was that maybe TS is a self-hosted
>> >> > language and cannot be bootstrapped. However, when I ran `guix search
>> >> > typescript`, it revealed the existence of some TS->JS compiler called
>> >> > ’rust-swc’. So I guess problems lie somewhere else, right?
>> >>
>> >> Nothing per se.  Note that «TypeScript is a strongly typed programming
>> >> language that builds on JavaScript» and from my understanding (maybe I
>> >> am wrong?), it is hard to package Javascript for Guix because the
>> >> Javascript ecosystem is messy.  Janneke provides some explanations [1]
>> >> and I am not convinced the situation have changed since then.  Maybe I
>> >> am wrong…
>> >>
>> >> 1: <https://yhetil.org/guix/87fudzndu7.fsf@gnu.org>
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> simon
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>
>

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature