[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:22:23 +0100
mu4e 1.8.13; emacs 28.1
Marek Paśnikowski <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> MuseScore is also GPL3-licensed,
> why would you deem it "worse" just because it is not under the GNU umbrella?
> I suggest to rethink this decision in a rational way -
> you may be surprised by the results.
Being under the GNU umbrella means that the software can be utilized
strategically to further Software Freedom.
Also who maintains a community makes a difference to the direction of
development. The typical GNU project is longer-lived than the typical
other Free Software project.
> We should not throw the baby out with the bathwater here.
> If Musescore is GPL3, is the best free music notation software
I disagree with the second point, because that’s lilypond :-)
> it just works and happens to have some bad people associated with its brand -
> maybe we should boycott those people instead of boycotting the software?
Is there already a fork with a different community?
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
Description: PGP signature
- midi, Gottfried, 2023/03/22
- Re: midi, Marek Paśnikowski, 2023/03/23
- Re: midi, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2023/03/23
- Re: midi, Gottfried, 2023/03/23
- Re: midi, Marek Paśnikowski, 2023/03/24
- Re: midi,
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide <=