[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
this-package-input vs. propagated-inputs in package definition
From: |
Andy Tai |
Subject: |
this-package-input vs. propagated-inputs in package definition |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Sep 2024 11:27:07 -0700 |
A question on package definition (likely scope of guix-devel, but
anyway posted here first):
I have updated the definition of package ddd which has libxft as
input. Libxft in turn has freefont as propagated-input. In the
definition of ddd I tried to do
(this-package-input "freefont")
which returns #f.
I had to add freefont as input to ddd to make this work.
As propagated-input should be propagated, shall the addition of
freefont as input to ddd be unneeded?
- this-package-input vs. propagated-inputs in package definition,
Andy Tai <=