[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ShadowFS (status)
From: |
Moritz Schulte |
Subject: |
Re: ShadowFS (status) |
Date: |
03 Aug 2001 02:17:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
Hello,
thanks for the help.
> > A node doesn't always point to the same underlying file. When user
> > A opens the file /shadowfs/foo he should get a port to the
> > underlying file.
>
> Yes, this is important. The user will get the port from the other
> filesystem, and not a port from shadowfs.
Ok, this is the key change. I understand.
> The inode number issue was what brought my thoughts back in place:
> The filesin the shadowfs should have the *same* fsid and fileno as
> the original files.
In the beginning i thought about that. But, hrrmm...
I'll try to make these changes.
moritz
--
Moritz Schulte <moritz@chaosdorf.de> http://www.chaosdorf.de/moritz/
Debian/GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org/ http://www.gnu.org/
GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98 4199
- ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/02
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/02
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/02
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/02
- Re: ShadowFS (status),
Moritz Schulte <=
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Niels Möller, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Niels Möller, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03