[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ShadowFS (status)
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: ShadowFS (status) |
Date: |
26 Aug 2001 16:52:24 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Moritz Schulte <moritz@chaosdorf.de> writes:
> Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
>
> > IIRC, the current implementation by Moritz does the lookup itself
> > and returns the appropriate port as if it were its own.
>
> If the user looks up a directory, he gets a port to a directory node,
> which is managed by shadowfs. If the user looks up a file, he directly
> gets a port to _that_ file, not a port to shadowfs.
Right, but he should get that port by doing a retry, not by having
shadowfs look it up in the real directory. Importantly, that would
get the permissions wrong.
- Re: ShadowFS (status), (continued)
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status),
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Niels Möller, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Steven Barker, 2001/08/27