[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy in FHS.
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy in FHS. |
Date: |
23 May 2002 09:26:14 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Jeroen Dekkers <jeroen@dekkers.cx> writes:
> Ok, the FSH is a unix standard, the difference doesn't really matter
> for us.
No, the FHS is a filesystem standard for Posix and related systems.
It is a perfectly appropriate sort of thing for GNU.
> If you build a GNU system from scratch your filesystem hierarchy will
> be as specified in the makefiles. So in fact the GNU Coding Standards
> defines how your filesystem looks like. The FHS is useless if no
> software actually implements it.
No, and I wish instead of your knee-jerk responses you'd think for a
bit.
The GNU Coding Standards are *massively* underspecified, and say
nothing about where a system integrator should install things.
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy in FHS., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/22