libmachuser vs libmach

[James Morrison]

 Hi,

   I've been looking though some of the mach interfaces and libmach is
mentioned
in a few places.  This looks to be libmachuser for us, is this correct?

  I'm also curious about the machine_slot_data_t type, the comment says it is
bogus, but the interface for xxx_slot_info uses machine_slot_data_t instead of
machien_slot_t, should this be fixed?  Also is there any reason that the
function
to get the function to get more information about a processor is prefixed with
xxx?



=====
James Morrison
   University of Waterloo
   Computer Science - Digital Hardware
   2A co-op
http://hurd.dyndns.org

Anyone referring to this as 'Open Source' shall be eaten by a GNU

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com