[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Asynchronous state machines
|
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
|
Subject: |
Re: Asynchronous state machines |
|
Date: |
27 Aug 2002 19:40:14 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Rich Bodo <rsb@ostel.com> writes:
> Have anyone diagrammed the HURD state machines? Verified the
> consistency of the same? Am I nuts and possibly shooting
> e-mail to the wrong list (that I'm not even subscribed to)?
Basically the Hurd protocols are too simple for this to be necessary.
Pretty much there is always only one state for the foreign object, as
far as the protocol is concerned, and any operation is reasonable at
any time.