help-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features


From: Shams
Subject: Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 00:37:16 +1300

Thanks for the info.

Regarding HurdNG:
1. Now HurdNG is this going to be recognised by GNU as the official 
kernel/userland
or is this going to run as a separate research project?

2. Are all Debian GNU/Hurd efforts and existing developers efforts going to 
be towards
HurdNG. More specifically is the current Hurd going to be abandoned in 
favour of HurdNG,
what is the future of this current Hurd?

3. Has the microkernel for HurdNG been chosen and if so then what language 
is going to be
used for HurdNG and the microkernel?

4. Regarding finding sym links and hard links. I mean currently 
/usr/bin/find resorts to traversing
the directory tree (which may be timeconsuming for example traversing from 
the root path ("/") to
find each coressponding sym/hard link for the given directory? Couldn't this 
be done somehow
with i-nodes directly where the i-node that given directory keeps records of 
all symlinks and hardlinks
for it?

Thanks
Shams

-- 

"Ivan Shmakov" <address@hidden> wrote in message 
news:address@hidden
>>>>>> "S" == Shams  <address@hidden> writes:
>
>        I don't participate in GNU/Hurd development, and I don't mean my
>        answers to be authoritative, but...
>
> S> Hi, 1. Will hurd still retain the symbolic link and hard link
> S> concept of Unix/Linux?
>
>        First of all, it should be noted that there're /two/ Hurds --
>        one is based on GNU Mach microkernel (and there're hosts on
>        which GNU/Hurd system is running currently), and the other --
>        HurdNG, which is just being planned.
>
>        While currently available GNU/Hurd system behaves in many
>        respects like a GNU/Linux system (and, in fact, shares a vast
>        amount of source code with the latter), HurdNG differences might
>        be much more significant.  However, my opinion is that already
>        developed code, when appears apt, should be used, so various
>        features available in UNIX or GNU/Linux should be provided as
>        well as the native HurdNG features.  Probably, by means of POSIX
>        emulation layer of some sort.
>
> S> * Also will it support hard links for directories?
>
>        This problem was discussed on the list some time ago.  My
>        opinion that it /shouldn't/ be done.  If one thinks of a
>        directory as a mapping of file names to actual file objects, and
>        of hard links as the alternate names to a file (directory)
>        object, then it becomes hard to decide, which file (directory)
>        the `..' name is mapped to?
>
> S> * Can tranlators be symbolic linked or hard linked?
>
> S> * Currently in *Nix one has to use the find command to find a list
> S> of all symbolic links and hard links. I am wondering if this will be
> S> made much more easier in hurd?
>
>        I don't understand.  Using $ find command to find symbolic links
>        doesn't seem to be hard at all:
>
> $ find -type s
>
>        On the other hand, what do you mean by finding hard links?  When
>        I do, e. g.:
>
> $ touch a
> $ ln a b
> $
>
>        Which one I should find, `a' or `b'?  From the point of UNIX,
>        they're completely equal and both designate the very same file.
>
> S> 2. Will it support the Linux LVM concept?
>
>        Looks like with HurdNG's ``space banks'', things would be even
>        better than with the Linux LVM.
>
> S> 3. Also what features does Hurd borrow or enhance from the Plan 9
> S> OS.  I mean for example Plan 9 abstracts everything as files.
>
>        The filesystem is itself to be implemented on top of more
>        general RPC interface in HurdNG.  It would allow every user (or
>        even every program) to ``have'' it's own filesystem.
>
> S> Will/does Hurd support such concept (its sees everthing as files) or
> S> is this just achievabal by existing or writing custom translators?
>
>        I think so.
>
> S> Also Debian/Philip thanks for releasing the K14 cd's. 







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]