RE: Trying to get rid of one redundand rule

[John Graham-Cumming]

On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 13:34 -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> %% John Graham-Cumming <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>   >> find them and an implicit rule for .cpp->.o triggers instead?
> 
>   jg> Because the built in %.o : %.cpp rule takes precedence.
> 
> It definitely shouldn't.  Patterns are tested in the order they are
> defined, and any pattern defined in a makefile is tested before any
> builtin pattern.

Ah, I am wrong.  I apologize.

John.
-- 
John Graham-Cumming

Home: http://www.jgc.org/
Work: http://www.electric-cloud.com/
POPFile: http://getpopfile.org/
GNU Make Standard Library: http://gmsl.sf.net/