[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Breaking from a for loop?
From: |
David Aldrich |
Subject: |
RE: Breaking from a for loop? |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:55:01 +0000 |
Hi Paul
> This is the second excellent reason why you should be using make
> constructs to do this rather than shell constructs: if you use make
> constructs then all handling of -k etc. works correctly (the first
> reason was already mentioned by Philip: to get better support for
> parallelism).
Ok, I'm convinced ;-)
Your example code worked perfectly. Thanks very much for your help.
Best regards
David
- Re: make gives exit status of 0 even when compile fails, (continued)
- Re: make gives exit status of 0 even when compile fails, Paul Smith, 2009/11/23
- RE: make gives exit status of 0 even when compile fails, David Aldrich, 2009/11/23
- Breaking from a for loop?, David Aldrich, 2009/11/23
- Re: Breaking from a for loop?, Philip Guenther, 2009/11/23
- RE: Breaking from a for loop?, David Aldrich, 2009/11/24
- RE: Breaking from a for loop?, Paul Smith, 2009/11/24
- RE: Breaking from a for loop?, David Aldrich, 2009/11/24
- RE: Breaking from a for loop?, Paul Smith, 2009/11/24
- RE: Breaking from a for loop?, David Aldrich, 2009/11/24
- RE: Breaking from a for loop?, Paul Smith, 2009/11/24
- RE: Breaking from a for loop?,
David Aldrich <=