[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Which version of Octave?
From: |
Przemek Klosowski |
Subject: |
Re: Which version of Octave? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:47:30 -0500 (EST) |
Well, let's not start the 'which shell is better' debate. Many people think
that the csh shell family is inferior; read the essay at
http://www.cs.brown.edu/people/scs/why.csh.sucks.
On the other hand, suckanalysis, the definitive scientific test for
software quality, reveals that csh is better: there are 45 Google hits
for the quoted phrase "csh sucks", while "bash sucks" comes with 152
hits.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Which version of Octave?, (continued)
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Christoph Dalitz, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Paul Kienzle, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Paul Kienzle, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, John W. Eaton, 2004/03/25
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Dirk Eddelbuettel, 2004/03/26
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/26
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Mike Miller, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Francesco Potorti`, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?,
Przemek Klosowski <=
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Mike Miller, 2004/03/23