[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Other access for information variables (except 'who')
|
From: |
David Bateman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Other access for information variables (except 'who') |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:00:19 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
> The result
> is processed by simple regular expression in order to remove command
> prompt 'octave X:>'.
Why not set PS1 to [], then there would be no prompt to remove...
> But I still can't find the way to access the information of local
> variables. The 'who -variables -long' is not appropriate to the concept
> pipe.readline() I used. Any recommendation is welcome.
Why? Look at the new "whos_line_format" that I believe was introduced
at 2.1.58 that can change the output format of "who -long" or "whos"
to be exactly the format you want...
Regards
David
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola CRM +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------